Nearly Half of Pulaski County's Owner-Occupied Housing Predates 1980
Central Arkansas does not have one uniform housing stock. Some counties have a much larger share of older owner-occupied housing than others.
The U.S. Census Bureau's 2020–2024 American Community Survey estimates that 48,876 of Pulaski County's 98,266 owner-occupied housing units were built before 1980. That is 49.7%, or about half.
The statewide estimate is 37.5%. Jefferson County and Garland County also have large shares of owner-occupied housing from before 1980, while the estimates are lower in Saline, Lonoke, and Faulkner counties.
| Area | Owner-occupied housing units | Built before 1980 | Estimated share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | 800,864 | 300,542 | 37.5% |
| Pulaski County | 98,266 | 48,876 | 49.7% |
| Jefferson County | 14,839 | 7,878 | 53.1% |
| Garland County | 30,296 | 12,534 | 41.4% |
| Saline County | 39,268 | 9,114 | 23.2% |
| Lonoke County | 21,403 | 4,418 | 20.6% |
| Faulkner County | 30,718 | 5,359 | 17.4% |
These are estimates, not complete property counts. The approximate 90% margins of error for the shares are ±0.4 percentage points for Arkansas, ±1.6 for Pulaski County, ±3.8 for Jefferson County, ±2.8 for Garland County, ±2.0 for Saline County, ±2.2 for Lonoke County, and ±1.6 for Faulkner County.
What the Numbers Measure
The source is American Community Survey Detailed Table B25036, Tenure by Year Structure Built. Its universe is occupied housing units. This brief uses the owner-occupied total and adds the table's five categories for units built in 1970–1979, 1960–1969, 1950–1959, 1940–1949, and 1939 or earlier.
The Census Bureau explains that year-built data help communities understand housing age and availability. Communities can use the information for housing programs, neighborhood planning, and emergency preparation.
The survey does not inspect individual houses. It does not tell us whether a particular roof leaks, an electrical panel is safe, a kitchen was updated, or a house will pass a buyer's inspection.
That limit matters. A house built in 1965 may have careful maintenance and updated systems. A much newer house may still have storm damage, drainage trouble, neglected maintenance, or a failed major system.
Housing Age Is a Starting Point, Not a Repair List
If you own an older house, start with what is happening at the property now. Separate a known problem from a concern based only on age.
Useful questions include:
- Is there active water intrusion, unsafe access, exposed wiring, structural movement, or another condition that needs prompt professional attention?
- Which roof, plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling, foundation, window, or drainage components have actually been inspected?
- Which systems were replaced or updated, and are records available?
- Would the suspected issue affect normal buyer financing, insurance, safe use, or only appearance?
- Is the proposed work likely to increase the buyer pool or final proceeds enough to justify its cost and delay?
Do not assume every old component must be replaced before a sale. Do not assume cosmetic work will return more money than it costs. The right answer depends on the house, the local buyer pool, the selling path, and the owner's deadline.
Paranova's guide to when to sell, price, and fix an Arkansas house explains the broader repair decision.
Get Real Repair Evidence Before Spending
For work that may be expensive or important to the sale, get the concern described clearly and obtain written estimates. The Arkansas Attorney General advises homeowners to get more than one estimate, check references, avoid pressure, never sign a contract with blanks, and put the cost, scope, schedule, payment terms, and other expectations in writing.
Check whether the contractor needs an Arkansas license for the exact work. The Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board says a residential remodeler license is needed for major structural changes or additions to a single-family residence when the project is more than $2,000, including labor and materials. A home improvement license covers certain specialty work over $2,000. The correct license depends on the work, so use the Board's current license information and contractor search rather than guessing from a company name.
For a house built before 1978, federal lead rules may also matter. EPA and HUD say buyers and renters of most pre-1978 housing must receive the federal lead pamphlet and known lead information before buying or renting. That rule does not prove a particular house contains a lead hazard, and it does not mean the owner should disturb old painted surfaces without proper guidance.
Compare Repair Benefit With Cost, Time, and Risk
A repair may be worth exploring when it stops active damage, addresses safety, restores a major function, removes a likely financing barrier, or clearly improves the property's buyer pool.
It may be weaker when the work is mostly personal taste, the likely price benefit is unclear, the owner cannot fund it safely, the schedule threatens an important deadline, or one project is likely to uncover several more.
Before choosing, write down:
- The condition that has actually been observed.
- What inspection or specialist opinion is still missing.
- At least two written estimates when practical.
- The time needed for work, permits, reinspection, cleanup, and listing.
- The monthly cost of holding the house during that delay.
- The source of any expected increase in sale price or buyer access.
- The chance of hidden work or a change order.
Then compare the full selling paths. A higher sale price is not automatically a better result after repairs, commissions, seller costs, credits, and holding expenses. Paranova's Arkansas seller-cost guide explains those costs. If you are comparing a direct cash offer with a financed sale, use the same assumptions for both routes and compare likely final proceeds, timing, and closing risk.
Printable Repair-Evidence Worksheet
Print one copy for each property. Use it to record repair evidence before deciding what to spend.
Property or nickname: _____________________________________
County: ____________________ Approximate year built: _________
Source of year built: ______________________________________
Desired sale timing: _______________________________________
Main concern to solve before selling: _______________________
- I separated conditions observed at the house from concerns based only on age.
- I recorded who observed or inspected each condition.
- I identified questions that still need a qualified professional.
- I checked whether the work may require an Arkansas license or permit.
- I will compare the likely benefit with cost, delay, and risk before deciding.
Possible Project 1
Repair or project: _________________________________________
Why it is being considered: [ ] Active damage [ ] Safety [ ] Function
[ ] Possible financing issue [ ] Buyer confidence [ ] Cosmetic preference
What has been observed and by whom: _________________________
Inspection or specialist still needed: ______________________
Written estimate 1 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Written estimate 2 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Applicable license checked: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not yet known
Expected work time and sale delay: __________________________
Evidence of likely buyer or sale benefit: ____________________
Hidden-work or change-order risk: ___________________________
Current decision: [ ] Investigate [ ] Repair [ ] Compare as-is options first [ ] Do not pursue now
Possible Project 2
Repair or project: _________________________________________
Why it is being considered: [ ] Active damage [ ] Safety [ ] Function
[ ] Possible financing issue [ ] Buyer confidence [ ] Cosmetic preference
What has been observed and by whom: _________________________
Inspection or specialist still needed: ______________________
Written estimate 1 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Written estimate 2 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Applicable license checked: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not yet known
Expected work time and sale delay: __________________________
Evidence of likely buyer or sale benefit: ____________________
Hidden-work or change-order risk: ___________________________
Current decision: [ ] Investigate [ ] Repair [ ] Compare as-is options first [ ] Do not pursue now
Possible Project 3
Repair or project: _________________________________________
Why it is being considered: [ ] Active damage [ ] Safety [ ] Function
[ ] Possible financing issue [ ] Buyer confidence [ ] Cosmetic preference
What has been observed and by whom: _________________________
Inspection or specialist still needed: ______________________
Written estimate 1 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Written estimate 2 — company, date, scope, and amount:
Applicable license checked: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not yet known
Expected work time and sale delay: __________________________
Evidence of likely buyer or sale benefit: ____________________
Hidden-work or change-order risk: ___________________________
Current decision: [ ] Investigate [ ] Repair [ ] Compare as-is options first [ ] Do not pursue now
Full Decision Check
Total up-front cash for selected projects: ____________________
Expected added holding time: ________________________________
Monthly holding cost from my records: _______________________
Expected sale-price or buyer-pool benefit and its source:
Questions for an agent, contractor, inspector, title company, insurer, or other professional:
- I compared the repair plan with listing as-is when that route is realistic.
- I compared the repair plan with a direct as-is offer when that route is realistic.
- I used the same cost and timing assumptions for every selling path.
- I did not treat an uncertain sale-price increase as guaranteed money.
When Selling As-Is May Be Worth Comparing
Selling as-is does not automatically produce the best price, and repairing does not automatically produce the best final result.
An as-is option may be worth comparing when repairs are large, estimates are uncertain, the house cannot sit through a long project, the owner does not want to manage contractors, or the property has several problems at once. Repairing and listing may be stronger when the work is clear, affordable, manageable, and likely to expand the buyer pool enough to improve final proceeds.
Paranova buys houses in Little Rock and nearby Central Arkansas markets in their current condition. You can ask questions or compare a direct offer without agreeing to sell and without repairing the house first.
See how Paranova's as-is process works.
Sources and Important Limits
The housing estimates come from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2020–2024 American Community Survey Detailed Table B25036. The category estimates were added for the before-1980 totals. Margins of error were combined using the Census Bureau's standard formulas for sums and subset percentages.
The Census Bureau explains why it collects year-built information. Repair guidance comes from the Arkansas Attorney General and the Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board. The pre-1978 disclosure note comes from the EPA and HUD Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Rule fact sheet.
This page provides general education only. It does not inspect a property or provide legal, tax, appraisal, insurance, construction, environmental, or real estate-agent advice. Use qualified local professionals for the actual house and decision.


